By Michael Kowalewski
"Violent scenes in American fiction are usually not merely brutal, bleak, and gratuitous," writes Michael Kowalewski. "They also are, by means of turns, comedian, witty, poignant, and infrequently, unusually sufficient, even terrifyingly beautiful." during this interesting travel of yank fiction, Kowalewski examines incidents starting from scalpings and torture within the Deerslayer to fish feeding off human viscera in To Have and feature now not, to teach how hugely charged descriptive passages undergo on significant concerns referring to a writer's craft. rather than concentrating on violence as a socio- cultural phenomenon, he explores how writers together with Cooper, Poe, Crane, Hemingway, Faulkner, Wright, Flannery O'Connor, and Pynchon draw on violence within the life like imagining in their works and the way their respective types maintain or counteract this imagining. Kowalewski starts off via supplying a brand new definition of realism, or practical imagining, and the rhetorical mind's eye that turns out to oppose it. Then for every writer he investigates how scenes of violence exemplify the stylistic imperatives extra ordinarily at paintings in that writer's fiction. utilizing violence because the severe get together for exploring the exact traits of authorial voice, lethal Musings addresses the query of what literary feedback is and needs to be, and the way it will probably practice extra usefully to the dynamics of verbal functionality.
Read Online or Download Deadly Musings PDF
Similar criticism & theory books
Jacques Derrida is one of the most famed ecu thinker alive this present day. The collage of Nebraska Press makes to be had for the 1st English translation of his most vital paintings up to now, Glas. Its visual appeal will support Derrida's readers seasoned and con in coming to phrases with a fancy and controversial book.
Axes strains the intimate courting among the texts released through Willa Cather and William Faulkner among 1922 and 1962. while these texts are juxtaposed and tested rigorously, the 2 writers look intensely aware of, and conscious of, each one other’s paintings. in truth, either sooner or later seem to have caricatured or parodied the opposite in print.
Psyche and the Literary Muses specializes in the psychology of literature from an empirical perspective, instead of the extra common psychoanalytic place, and concentrates on literary content material instead of readers or writers. The publication facilities at the author’s quantitative reports of short literary and quasi-literary kinds, starting from titles of brief tales and names of literary characters to clichés and quotations from literary resources, in demonstrating their contribution to the themes of studying, conception, pondering, feelings, creativity, and particularly individual belief and getting older.
- Memory, Narrative, Identity: Remembering the Self
- Novels for Students: Presenting Analysis, Context and Criticism on Commonly Studied Novels Volume 4
- 100 Masters of Mystery and Detective Fiction
- Red Planets: Marxism and Science Fiction
- Overtones of Opera in American Literature from Whitman to Wharton
Extra resources for Deadly Musings
It comprises a fascination with the imaginative process by which something can be made to seem empirical, a fascination with the actions of a prose that can make physical and sensory details seem justified because they seem self-evident. Their plausibility is made to seem referential (in Barthes’s terms) rather than aesthetic or discursive. Such details seem to be what they are because there is so little else they might be: least of all “just” words. This illusion of course, like all illusions, is conjured, and it is the verbal action and form responsible for it, rather than the ideological purpose it might be said to express or fulfill, that concerns me here.
The very possibility of realism in fictional description depends upon writing that generates and sustains the illusion of realistic action and life, and that illusion springs from the verbal eVects that are kept from impinging upon it as well as from those that initiate it. Elmore Leonard’s remark is apt for my purposes because it emphasizes that what often makes writing seem like “writing” (and thus not, the logic goes, like life) is sound. For Leonard, an accomplished realism involves more than simply rejecting or revitalizing outmoded diction or certain representational conventions.
But that specter, that one aspect of language, can always be made, in critical discussion of a work, to cancel out the other motives and eVects of which our verbal imaginations are capable. By taking the capacity of language to signify or “mean” as its most intimate possibility, its only imaginative function (or by relying upon that conception in order to deconstruct it), we frequently fail to recognize how often such capacities do not characterize our experience of words, how often certain fictional conditions make meaning or communication or signification a suVerance or a courtesy rather than an obligation.